Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aubrey Meyer

Aubrey Meyer

← Previous revision Revision as of 23:11, 19 April 2026 Line 15: Line 15: :* '''Delete or Support Draftify -''' Looking through typical searches, I can't really find anything that supports [[WP:GNG]]. There was one I thought I did find here [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/apr/02/climate-change], until I noticed it was written by Aubrey as well. Article is widely [[WP:PROMO]]. Another suggestion with a consensus is to possibly '''redirect''' or '''merge''' to [[Global Commons Institute]] since the articles subject is a co-founder with the company. Not much of secondary or even independent sourcing I can find of this individual. :* '''Delete or Support Draftify -''' Looking through typical searches, I can't really find anything that supports [[WP:GNG]]. There was one I thought I did find here [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/apr/02/climate-change], until I noticed it was written by Aubrey as well. Article is widely [[WP:PROMO]]. Another suggestion with a consensus is to possibly '''redirect''' or '''merge''' to [[Global Commons Institute]] since the articles subject is a co-founder with the company. Not much of secondary or even independent sourcing I can find of this individual. :[[User:JLN2026|JLN2026]] ([[User talk:JLN2026|talk]]) 20:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC) :[[User:JLN2026|JLN2026]] ([[User talk:JLN2026|talk]]) 20:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC) :'''Emphatic delete'''. The article clearly has serious problems, aside from [[WP:CIO]] it is essentially just a CV and review page (reference 1 being the subject's actual CV is something I've never seen before). I would support deletion over draftification or similar since there doesn't seem to be any notable secondary material on the subject (there is some on C&C but none directly concerning him in my limited research). Most of the sources are from one website only and I think this is at very least a situation for [[WP:TNT]], but honestly I don't think this has a chance of passing [[WP:NBIO]] or [[WP:GNG]] currently. [[User:Harryb7|Harryb7]] ([[User talk:Harryb7|talk]]) 23:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC) *:'''Emphatic delete'''. The article clearly has serious problems, aside from [[WP:CIO]] it is essentially just a CV and review page (reference 1 being the subject's actual CV is something I've never seen before). I would support deletion over draftification or similar since there doesn't seem to be any notable secondary material on the subject (there is some on C&C but none directly concerning him in my limited research). Most of the sources are from one website only and I think this is at very least a situation for [[WP:TNT]], but honestly I don't think this has a chance of passing [[WP:NBIO]] or [[WP:GNG]] currently. [[User:Harryb7|Harryb7]] ([[User talk:Harryb7|talk]]) 23:11, 19 April 2026 (UTC)