Talk:Utopia, Limited

Unresolved?: reply

← Previous revision Revision as of 17:57, 21 April 2026 Line 212: Line 212: ::I don't see how one can consider the current discussion about right, since it is not factually correct. The audience does know what happens to the judges desire for Zara. It may be a dissatisfying resolution, but it is a resolution. If we are willing to change the wording to that effect I would be okay with that. ::I don't see how one can consider the current discussion about right, since it is not factually correct. The audience does know what happens to the judges desire for Zara. It may be a dissatisfying resolution, but it is a resolution. If we are willing to change the wording to that effect I would be okay with that. ::I suspect the references wound up here through some editing mistake, but they would support a claim that the cut scene would have supplied a more clearcut resolution to the matter. [[User:Mgolden|Mgolden]] ([[User talk:Mgolden|talk]]) 14:16, 21 April 2026 (UTC) ::I suspect the references wound up here through some editing mistake, but they would support a claim that the cut scene would have supplied a more clearcut resolution to the matter. [[User:Mgolden|Mgolden]] ([[User talk:Mgolden|talk]]) 14:16, 21 April 2026 (UTC) :::I disagree with your reading of, and speculations about, the sources. -- [[User:Ssilvers|Ssilvers]] ([[User talk:Ssilvers|talk]]) 17:57, 21 April 2026 (UTC)