Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Government attacks on journalists during the Trump presidencies

Government attacks on journalists during the Trump presidencies: Reply

← Previous revision Revision as of 06:13, 5 May 2026 Line 41: Line 41: *:Notice how '''believing an article move should take place''' is '''not''' a valid reason listed for deletion. If you believe the article should be moved, then start a move discussion. Threatening to delete an article ''unless'' it's moved is not the correct way to go about this and does not correspond to Wikipedia policy. [[User:Alexandraaaacs1989|Alexandraaaacs1989]] ([[User talk:Alexandraaaacs1989|talk]]) 05:33, 5 May 2026 (UTC) *:Notice how '''believing an article move should take place''' is '''not''' a valid reason listed for deletion. If you believe the article should be moved, then start a move discussion. Threatening to delete an article ''unless'' it's moved is not the correct way to go about this and does not correspond to Wikipedia policy. [[User:Alexandraaaacs1989|Alexandraaaacs1989]] ([[User talk:Alexandraaaacs1989|talk]]) 05:33, 5 May 2026 (UTC) ::::It's not "suitable for an encyclopedia" for an article to describe a bunch of awful things, and then naming someone in the title who had nothing to do with them. Also, deletion is okay for "Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons", which says: "Contentious material about living (or, in some cases, recently deceased) persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." There are no sources indicating Trump is connected to the content of this article.[[User:Anythingyouwant| Anythingyouwant]] ([[User talk:Anythingyouwant|talk]]) 05:58, 5 May 2026 (UTC) ::::It's not "suitable for an encyclopedia" for an article to describe a bunch of awful things, and then naming someone in the title who had nothing to do with them. Also, deletion is okay for "Articles that breach Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons", which says: "Contentious material about living (or, in some cases, recently deceased) persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." There are no sources indicating Trump is connected to the content of this article.[[User:Anythingyouwant| Anythingyouwant]] ([[User talk:Anythingyouwant|talk]]) 05:58, 5 May 2026 (UTC) :::::{{tq|It's not "suitable for an encyclopedia" for an article to describe a bunch of awful things, and then naming someone in the title '''who had nothing to do with them'''}} Did you [[WP:READFIRST|read]] the lede of the article, or my [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Government_attacks_on_journalists_during_the_Trump_presidencies#c-Alexandraaaacs1989-20260505050700-Bremps-20260505043800 reply] to the nominator, before writing this? I already explained why he has ''something'' to do with the events. :::::On the second claim you make, it qualifies deletion is okay '''if {{tq|poorly sourced}}'''. But you brought no arguments forth saying it's poorly sourced, so your argument is logically invalid. [[WP:OUTRAGE]] says {{tq|The fact that an idea or topic is morally outrageous is not a reason to leave it out of Wikipedia. If a morally outrageous idea or practice has received notable coverage from independent sources (not just its originator), we provide a valuable service by describing it ''as well as'' the criticisms and opposition it has received.}} [[User:Alexandraaaacs1989|Alexandraaaacs1989]] ([[User talk:Alexandraaaacs1989|talk]]) 06:13, 5 May 2026 (UTC)