Talk:Laura Slatkin

Wikipedia - Recent changes [en] - Tuesday, May 5, 2026

← Previous revision Revision as of 10:29, 5 May 2026 Line 13: Line 13: ::I'm not sure what the logic behind nomination for deletion is as there is no ambivalence. According to guidelines for notability: 5. 'The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.' Therefore the subject of the page is notable and the page should not be deleted. [[User:Srsval|Srsval]] ([[User talk:Srsval|talk]]) 11:18, 1 May 2026 (UTC) ::I'm not sure what the logic behind nomination for deletion is as there is no ambivalence. According to guidelines for notability: 5. 'The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.' Therefore the subject of the page is notable and the page should not be deleted. [[User:Srsval|Srsval]] ([[User talk:Srsval|talk]]) 11:18, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :::Frankly, I declined the speedy not because the subject is especially [[WP:Notable]]. Because the subject is clearly [[WP:Verifiable]], the page did not qualify for [[WP:A7]] speedy deletion, IMHO. The sourcing is still quite weak; academics don't get as much respect as you might think at AfD, often lacking coverage from multiple in-depth and independent sources. See [[WP:PROF]]. I'd fortify this page as best you can before somebody nominates it. Academic book reviews may help. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 12:59, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :::Frankly, I declined the speedy not because the subject is especially [[WP:Notable]]. Because the subject is clearly [[WP:Verifiable]], the page did not qualify for [[WP:A7]] speedy deletion, IMHO. The sourcing is still quite weak; academics don't get as much respect as you might think at AfD, often lacking coverage from multiple in-depth and independent sources. See [[WP:PROF]]. I'd fortify this page as best you can before somebody nominates it. Academic book reviews may help. [[User:BusterD|BusterD]] ([[User talk:BusterD|talk]]) 12:59, 1 May 2026 (UTC) ::::In relative comparison to other biographical Wikipedia pages of academics, I think that the citations are fine [[User:Srsval|Srsval]] ([[User talk:Srsval|talk]]) 10:29, 5 May 2026 (UTC)