cose

Massif de Chambeyron
Add categorization templates (via redirect-helper) ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:27, 19 April 2026 Line 1: Line 1: #REDIRECT [[Chambeyron Massif]] #REDIRECT [[Chambeyron Massif]] {{Redirect category shell| {{R from alternative language|fr|en|printworthy=yes}} }}
Daphne van Domselaar
International: Updated ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:27, 19 April 2026 Line 151: Line 151: ===International=== ===International=== {{updated|match played 14 April 2026}}<ref name=soccerway/> {{updated|match played 18 April 2026}}<ref name=soccerway/> {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" |+ Appearances and goals by national team and year |+ Appearances and goals by national team and year Line 166: Line 166: |2025||8||0 |2025||8||0 |- |- |2026||1||0 |2026||2||0 |- |- !colspan="2"|Total||38||0 !colspan="2"|Total||39||0 |} |}
Cordite
Development of Cordites: removed duplicate subsection title ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:27, 19 April 2026 Line 40: Line 40: [[Imperial Chemical Industries]]'s (ICI) World War II double-base propellant ''AN'' formulation also had a much lower temperature than Cordite Mk 1, but it lacked the flash reduction properties of N and NQ triple-base propellants.{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}} [[Imperial Chemical Industries]]'s (ICI) World War II double-base propellant ''AN'' formulation also had a much lower temperature than Cordite Mk 1, but it lacked the flash reduction properties of N and NQ triple-base propellants.{{Citation needed|date=January 2021}} === Nobel and Abel patent dispute === === Nobel and Abel patent dispute === === Nobel and Abel patent dispute === {{see also|Patent|Patent claim|Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks Act 1883}} {{see also|Patent|Patent claim|Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks Act 1883}}
Template:Morgan Wallen songs
Add single ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:27, 19 April 2026 Line 85: Line 85: *"[[Graveyard Whistling (song)|Graveyard Whistling]]" *"[[Graveyard Whistling (song)|Graveyard Whistling]]" *"[[McArthur (song)|McArthur]]" *"[[McArthur (song)|McArthur]]" *"[[I Can't Love You Anymore]]" | group7 = Featured singles | group7 = Featured singles
Egra Assembly constituency
← Previous revision Revision as of 08:27, 19 April 2026 Line 28: Line 28: Egra Assembly constituency is part of No. 34 [[Medinipur (Lok Sabha constituency)]].<ref name=delimitation/> It was earlier part of [[Contai (Lok Sabha constituency)]]. Egra Assembly constituency is part of No. 34 [[Medinipur (Lok Sabha constituency)]].<ref name=delimitation/> It was earlier part of [[Contai (Lok Sabha constituency)]]. ==Election results== 2026 Election box begin |title=[[2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election]]: Egra}} {{Election box winning candidate with party link| |party = Trinamool Congress |candidate = Tarun Maity |votes = |percentage = |change = }} {{Election box candidate with party link| |party = Bharatiya Janata Party |candidate = Dibyendu Adhikari |votes = |percentage = }} {{Election box candidate with party link| |party = Indian National Congress |candidate = |votes = |percentage = }} {{Election box candidate with party link| |party = NOTA |candidate = None of the Above |votes = |percentage = }} {{Election box candidate with party link| |party = Socialist Unity Centre of India |candidate = |votes = |percentage = |change = }} {{Election box majority| |votes = |percentage = |change = }} {{Election box hold with party link| |winner = |loser = |swing = }} {{Election box end}}
Template:Pending series key
Updated ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:26, 19 April 2026 Line 7: Line 7: == Usage == == Usage == Use {{tlc|Pending series key}} to create key legend for pending series to show for filmography tables. Use {{tlc|Pending series key}} to create key legend for pending series to show for filmography tables. == See also == * [[Template:Pending films key]] }} }}
User talk:HouseBlaster
ISIS ISIL IS categories: Reply ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:26, 19 April 2026 Line 66: Line 66: :::I think IS would be bad to use in category names, it's not clear or if context. [[User:LateNightCoffee|Late Night Coffee]] ([[User talk:LateNightCoffee|talk]]) 00:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::I think IS would be bad to use in category names, it's not clear or if context. [[User:LateNightCoffee|Late Night Coffee]] ([[User talk:LateNightCoffee|talk]]) 00:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::"Islamic State" is a problem on some subcategories. There are two about Afghanistan, that include things that might not be ISK. Using "Islamic State" in those is too easily confused with [[Islamic State of Afghanistan]], that became present day Afghanistan. [[User:LateNightCoffee|Late Night Coffee]] ([[User talk:LateNightCoffee|talk]]) 00:34, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::"Islamic State" is a problem on some subcategories. There are two about Afghanistan, that include things that might not be ISK. Using "Islamic State" in those is too easily confused with [[Islamic State of Afghanistan]], that became present day Afghanistan. [[User:LateNightCoffee|Late Night Coffee]] ([[User talk:LateNightCoffee|talk]]) 00:34, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:Mikewem|Mikewem]] You raise a really interesting point about how fine-grained these distinctions should be in category space. From a practical standpoint, it does start to feel like a “distinction without a difference” when the entities in question, ISIL and its affiliates like ISSP, are closely tied in origin, branding, and operational alignment. :At the same time, I can see why someone might want to preserve that nuance. ISSP, while linked to Islamic State, operates in a specific regional and organizational context that might justify separate categorization, especially if consistency is applied across other affiliates as well. :Maybe the question isn’t just whether ISIL and ISSP are “close enough,” but whether the categorization system is meant to prioritize conceptual clarity or structural consistency. If the goal is clarity, something like the former “ISIS-related” label might indeed capture that relationship better. If it’s consistency, then keeping parent vs. affiliate distinctions separate could make more sense. :The “berry” analogy actually helps highlight the issue, whether we’re grouping by core identity or by subtype. It might be worth aligning on that principle first before deciding how to categorize specific cases. [[User:Iambethanycox|Iambethanycox]] ([[User talk:Iambethanycox|talk]]) 08:26, 19 April 2026 (UTC) === New category request === === New category request ===
Collybistin
fix date values in citation, so that the error message appearing in "References" section is now removed ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:26, 19 April 2026 Line 34: Line 34: The gene [[ARHGEF9]] (aka ARHDH) codes for Collybistin. Through [[immunohistochemistry]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ibaraki|first=Kyoko|last2=Mizuno|first2=Makoto|last3=Aoki|first3=Hitomi|last4=Niwa|first4=Ayumi|last5=Iwamoto|first5=Ikuko|last6=Hara|first6=Akira|last7=Tabata|first7=Hidenori|last8=Ito|first8=Hidenori|last9=Nagata|first9=Koh-ichi|date=2018|title=Biochemical and Morphological Characterization of a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor ARHGEF9 in Mouse Tissues|url=https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ahc/51/3/51_18009/_article/-char/ja/|journal=Acta Histochemica Et Cytochemica|volume=51|issue=3|pages=119–128|doi=10.1267/ahc.18009}}</ref> it was discovered that the production of collybistin changes throughout developmental stages of organisms. Additionally, ARHGEF9 can be found in various regions of the brain, such as the [[Cerebral cortex|cerbral cortex]], [[hippocampus]] and [[cerebellum]], but only in locations where [[neurological]] synapse fire. The gene [[ARHGEF9]] (aka ARHDH) codes for Collybistin. Through [[immunohistochemistry]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Ibaraki|first=Kyoko|last2=Mizuno|first2=Makoto|last3=Aoki|first3=Hitomi|last4=Niwa|first4=Ayumi|last5=Iwamoto|first5=Ikuko|last6=Hara|first6=Akira|last7=Tabata|first7=Hidenori|last8=Ito|first8=Hidenori|last9=Nagata|first9=Koh-ichi|date=2018|title=Biochemical and Morphological Characterization of a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor ARHGEF9 in Mouse Tissues|url=https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ahc/51/3/51_18009/_article/-char/ja/|journal=Acta Histochemica Et Cytochemica|volume=51|issue=3|pages=119–128|doi=10.1267/ahc.18009}}</ref> it was discovered that the production of collybistin changes throughout developmental stages of organisms. Additionally, ARHGEF9 can be found in various regions of the brain, such as the [[Cerebral cortex|cerbral cortex]], [[hippocampus]] and [[cerebellum]], but only in locations where [[neurological]] synapse fire. Any mutations within this gene may cause various negative symptoms within the organism. The organism may experience things such as intellectual disabilities, [[Anxiety disorder|anxiety]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Saiepour|first=Leila|last2=Fuchs|first2=Celine|last3=Patrizi|first3=Annarita|last4=Sassoè-Pognetto|first4=Marco|last5=Harvey|first5=Robert J.|last6=Harvey|first6=Kirsten|date=2010-09-01|title=Complex Role of Collybistin and Gephyrin in GABAA Receptor Clustering[S]*|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192582052680X|journal=Journal of Biological Chemistry|volume=285|issue=38|pages=29623–29631|doi=10.1074/jbc.M110.121368|issn=0021-9258}}</ref> [[hyperekplexia]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wang |first=Jing-Yang |last2=Zhou |first2=Peng |last3=Wang |first3=Jie |last4=Tang |first4=Bin |last5=Su |first5=Tao |last6=Liu |first6=Xiao-Rong |last7=Li |first7=Bing-Mei |last8=Meng |first8=Heng |last9=Shi |first9=Yi-Wu |last10=Yi |first10=Yong-Hong |last11=He |first11=Na |last12=Liao |first12=Wei-Ping |date=2018-01-01 |title=ARHGEF9 mutations in epileptic encephalopathy/intellectual disability: toward understanding the mechanism underlying phenotypic variation |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-017-0528-2 |journal=neurogenetics |language=en |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=9–16 |doi=10.1007/s10048-017-0528-2 |issn=1364-6753}}</ref> etc. In a study done in 2011,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Shimojima |first=Keiko |last2=Sugawara |first2=Midori |last3=Shichiji |first3=Minobu |last4=Mukaida |first4=Souichi |last5=Takayama |first5=Rumiko |last6=Imai |first6=Katsumi |last7=Yamamoto |first7=Toshiyuki |date=2011-08 |title=Loss-of-function mutation of collybistin is responsible for X-linked mental retardation associated with epilepsy |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg201158 |journal=Journal of Human Genetics |language=en |volume=56 |issue=8 |pages=561–565 |doi=10.1038/jhg.2011.58 |issn=1435-232X}}</ref> there was a direct link found between a nonsynonymous deletion in the ARHGEF9 gene and mental disability, along with physical disability. Similarly, it has been reported that missense mutations within the gene have also caused mental and physical disabilities to the organism with the mutated gene. Any mutations within this gene may cause various negative symptoms within the organism. The organism may experience things such as intellectual disabilities, [[Anxiety disorder|anxiety]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Saiepour|first=Leila|last2=Fuchs|first2=Celine|last3=Patrizi|first3=Annarita|last4=Sassoè-Pognetto|first4=Marco|last5=Harvey|first5=Robert J.|last6=Harvey|first6=Kirsten|date=2010-09-01|title=Complex Role of Collybistin and Gephyrin in GABAA Receptor Clustering[S]*|url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002192582052680X|journal=Journal of Biological Chemistry|volume=285|issue=38|pages=29623–29631|doi=10.1074/jbc.M110.121368|issn=0021-9258}}</ref> [[hyperekplexia]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wang |first=Jing-Yang |last2=Zhou |first2=Peng |last3=Wang |first3=Jie |last4=Tang |first4=Bin |last5=Su |first5=Tao |last6=Liu |first6=Xiao-Rong |last7=Li |first7=Bing-Mei |last8=Meng |first8=Heng |last9=Shi |first9=Yi-Wu |last10=Yi |first10=Yong-Hong |last11=He |first11=Na |last12=Liao |first12=Wei-Ping |date=2018-01-01 |title=ARHGEF9 mutations in epileptic encephalopathy/intellectual disability: toward understanding the mechanism underlying phenotypic variation |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-017-0528-2 |journal=neurogenetics |language=en |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=9–16 |doi=10.1007/s10048-017-0528-2 |issn=1364-6753}}</ref> etc. In a study done in 2011,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Shimojima |first=Keiko |last2=Sugawara |first2=Midori |last3=Shichiji |first3=Minobu |last4=Mukaida |first4=Souichi |last5=Takayama |first5=Rumiko |last6=Imai |first6=Katsumi |last7=Yamamoto |first7=Toshiyuki |date=August 2011 |title=Loss-of-function mutation of collybistin is responsible for X-linked mental retardation associated with epilepsy |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg201158 |journal=Journal of Human Genetics |language=en |volume=56 |issue=8 |pages=561–565 |doi=10.1038/jhg.2011.58 |issn=1435-232X}}</ref> there was a direct link found between a nonsynonymous deletion in the ARHGEF9 gene and mental disability, along with physical disability. Similarly, it has been reported that missense mutations within the gene have also caused mental and physical disabilities to the organism with the mutated gene. == Isoforms == == Isoforms ==
Pariah state
China (1949–present): rm access date error ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:26, 19 April 2026 Line 78: Line 78: ====China (1949–present)==== ====China (1949–present)==== [[File:Battle of Triangle Hill Chinese Infantrymen.jpg|thumb|alt=Squad of infantrymen in a defensive position|Chinese infantrymen in action at the [[battle of Triangle Hill]]]] [[File:Battle of Triangle Hill Chinese Infantrymen.jpg|thumb|alt=Squad of infantrymen in a defensive position|Chinese infantrymen in action at the [[battle of Triangle Hill]]]] [[China]] has been described as a pariah state or "international pariah" in various historical and contemporary contexts since its founding in 1949, particularly during periods of diplomatic isolation, ideological extremism, and human rights controversies. While not a "classic" pariah state like those isolated for nuclear proliferation or state terrorism, China faced significant ostracism from Western powers and international institutions in its early years, with ongoing rhetorical use of the term amid tensions over Taiwan, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong.<ref name="WilsonCenter2019">{{cite web |title=The Opening of the Chinese Mind |url=https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/the-opening-the-chinese-mind |website=Wilson Center |date=November 6, 2019 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref><ref name="JSTOR2010">{{cite journal |last=Reilly |first=James |title=China's Orphaned Diplomacy: The Taiwan Issue and the Rise of Asia |journal=Journal of Contemporary China |volume=19 |issue=66 |pages=725–744 |year=2010 |doi=10.1080/10670564.2010.495925 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref> From 1949 to 1972, the PRC was largely treated as a pariah state by the West due to its communist ideology, support for revolutionary movements, and conflicts like the [[Korean War]] (1950–1953). The United States imposed a trade embargo and withheld recognition until 1979, while the PRC was excluded from the [[United Nations]] until [[United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758|Resolution 2758]] in 1971 transferred China's seat from the [[Republic of China]] (Taiwan) to the PRC. During this era, China aligned with the [[Soviet Union]] until the [[Sino-Soviet split]] in the 1960s, and the [[Cultural Revolution]] (1966–1976) further internalized its isolation, making it a "pariah" in global diplomacy.<ref name="WilsonCenter2019"/><ref name="JSTOR2010"/> The 1972 [[Nixon visit to China]] marked the beginning of normalization, shifting China from pariah to a strategic partner in the [[Cold War]] against the Soviet Union. Post-[[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]], China faced renewed isolation as a pariah state with Western sanctions, arms embargoes, and diplomatic freezes over the violent suppression of pro-democracy demonstrators. This period of ostracism was temporary, with relations normalizing by the mid-1990s amid economic reforms and WTO accession in 2001.<ref name="Economist2021">{{cite news |title=China is becoming a pariah state |url=https://www.economist.com/china/2021/07/24/china-is-becoming-a-pariah-state |work=The Economist |date=July 24, 2021 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref> In recent years (2010s–present), China has been labeled a pariah state by critics for human rights abuses in [[Xinjiang]] (including alleged genocide against [[Uyghurs]]), crackdowns in [[Hong Kong]], aggressive policies toward [[Taiwan]], and its role in the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]'s origins. U.S. officials like President [[Joe Biden]] have called China a "pariah" on climate issues if uncooperative, while analysts note its increasing isolation from the West despite economic power and alliances with Russia and the Global South.<ref name="NYT2020">{{cite news |title=How China Became a Pariah on the World Stage |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/world/asia/china-coronavirus-who.html |work=The New York Times |date=July 14, 2020 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref><ref name="Economist2021"/> [[China]] has been described as a pariah state or "international pariah" in various historical and contemporary contexts since its founding in 1949, particularly during periods of diplomatic isolation, ideological extremism, and human rights controversies. While not a "classic" pariah state like those isolated for nuclear proliferation or state terrorism, China faced significant ostracism from Western powers and international institutions in its early years, with ongoing rhetorical use of the term amid tensions over Taiwan, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong.<ref name="WilsonCenter2019">{{cite web |title=The Opening of the Chinese Mind |url=https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/the-opening-the-chinese-mind |website=Wilson Center |date=November 6, 2019 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref><ref name="JSTOR2010">{{cite journal |last=Reilly |first=James |title=China's Orphaned Diplomacy: The Taiwan Issue and the Rise of Asia |journal=Journal of Contemporary China |volume=19 |issue=66 |pages=725–744 |year=2010 |doi=10.1080/10670564.2010.495925}}</ref> From 1949 to 1972, the PRC was largely treated as a pariah state by the West due to its communist ideology, support for revolutionary movements, and conflicts like the [[Korean War]] (1950–1953). The United States imposed a trade embargo and withheld recognition until 1979, while the PRC was excluded from the [[United Nations]] until [[United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758|Resolution 2758]] in 1971 transferred China's seat from the [[Republic of China]] (Taiwan) to the PRC. During this era, China aligned with the [[Soviet Union]] until the [[Sino-Soviet split]] in the 1960s, and the [[Cultural Revolution]] (1966–1976) further internalized its isolation, making it a "pariah" in global diplomacy.<ref name="WilsonCenter2019"/><ref name="JSTOR2010"/> The 1972 [[Nixon visit to China]] marked the beginning of normalization, shifting China from pariah to a strategic partner in the [[Cold War]] against the Soviet Union. Post-[[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]], China faced renewed isolation as a pariah state with Western sanctions, arms embargoes, and diplomatic freezes over the violent suppression of pro-democracy demonstrators. This period of ostracism was temporary, with relations normalizing by the mid-1990s amid economic reforms and WTO accession in 2001.<ref name="Economist2021">{{cite news |title=China is becoming a pariah state |url=https://www.economist.com/china/2021/07/24/china-is-becoming-a-pariah-state |work=The Economist |date=July 24, 2021 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref> In recent years (2010s–present), China has been labeled a pariah state by critics for human rights abuses in [[Xinjiang]] (including alleged genocide against [[Uyghurs]]), crackdowns in [[Hong Kong]], aggressive policies toward [[Taiwan]], and its role in the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]'s origins. U.S. officials like President [[Joe Biden]] have called China a "pariah" on climate issues if uncooperative, while analysts note its increasing isolation from the West despite economic power and alliances with Russia and the Global South.<ref name="NYT2020">{{cite news |title=How China Became a Pariah on the World Stage |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/14/world/asia/china-coronavirus-who.html |work=The New York Times |date=July 14, 2020 |access-date=February 2, 2026}}</ref><ref name="Economist2021"/> ====Indonesia during 1975–1999 occupation of East Timor==== ====Indonesia during 1975–1999 occupation of East Timor====
Type F127 frigate
Naval gun fix ← Previous revision Revision as of 08:26, 19 April 2026 Line 72: Line 72: ** 2 × 4-cell Kongsberg [[Naval Strike Missile|NSM Block 1a]] [[cruise missile]]s ([[Anti-ship missile|ASM]] / [[Land-attack missile|LAM]]) ** 2 × 4-cell Kongsberg [[Naval Strike Missile|NSM Block 1a]] [[cruise missile]]s ([[Anti-ship missile|ASM]] / [[Land-attack missile|LAM]]) *'''Naval Guns:''' *'''Naval Guns:''' ** 1 × [[Otobreda 127/64|OTO 127/64 LW - VULCANO System]] ** 1 × [[5-inch/54-caliber Mark 45 gun]] ** 2 × MSI Seahawk 30mm RWS ** 2 × MSI Seahawk 30mm RWS *'''Machine guns''' *'''Machine guns'''